Noah Archives Macktez.com

Wear



06/29/2007 - 12:27


My other places

Blog - My current blog (This is my former one)
Firm - My fellow peeps
Silversmithing - Portfolio & store
Wishlist - At Amazon
Atom - Not-quite-compliant
Friendster - Why oh why?
Myspace - Uh, yeah.
Flickr - Lots of photos

Others' places

Fa - His projects
Ma - Her artwork
Noah - Not me, the other one
Fringe - Dee Dee's Mag
Ev - Prolific mofo
WorkBee - Pinhole cameras
Saturation- Mister Brown
Friends of Buck's Bock - A non-profit
Dojo - Training






Archives

2007 | August
2007 | July
2007 | June
2007 | May
2007 | April
2007 | March
2007 | February
2007 | January
2006 | December
2006 | November
2006 | October
2006 | September
2006 | August
2006 | July
2006 | June
2006 | May
2006 | April
2006 | March
2006 | February
2006 | January
2005 | December
2005 | November
2005 | October
2005 | September
2005 | August
2005 | July
2005 | June
2005 | May
2005 | April
2005 | March
2005 | February
2005 | January
2004 | December
2004 | November
2004 | October
2004 | September
2004 | August
2004 | July
2004 | June
2004 | May
2004 | April
2004 | March
2004 | February
2004 | January
2003 | December
2003 | November
2003 | October
2003 | September
2003 | August
2003 | July
2003 | June
2003 | May
2003 | April
2003 | March
2003 | February
2003 | January
2002 | December



Tracker

Haven't posted a proper entry here in some time, but the Stain Teacup (Found via OL) resonates with my long-time interest in the role of wear/damage/time in design. My semi-senior thesis pointed out that an advantage of a traditional card catalog over (at that time) existing electronic replacements was the naturally occurring overlay of history/usage that dirt and grime create. In order words, when looking at a card catalog drawer (The actual thesis was actually printed on card and delivered in a found card catalog drawer.) one can quickly see what cards and sections have seen the greatest use, which are oldest, which are on one type of paper versus another. While this information is not properly structured (No taxonomies of card fraying or dirty fingers of which I am aware) it is nevertheless informative in (What I would argue is) an intuitive way.

 
Design © 2004 Macktez Corporation, Content © 2004 by respective authors