Noah Archives Macktez.com

Sunlight



07/28/2005 - 11:32
trackback - links to here


My other places

Firm - My fellow peeps
Silversmithing - Portfolio & store
Wishlist - At Amazon
Atom - Not-quite-compliant
Friendster - Why oh why?
Myspace - Uh, yeah.
Flickr - Lots of photos

Others' places

Fa - His projects
Ma - Her artwork
Noah - Not me, the other one
Fringe - Dee Dee's Mag
Ev - Prolific mofo
WorkBee - Pinhole cameras
Saturation- Mister Brown
Friends of Buck's Bock - A non-profit
Dojo - Training






Archives

2006 | November
2006 | October
2006 | September
2006 | August
2006 | July
2006 | June
2006 | May
2006 | April
2006 | March
2006 | February
2006 | January
2005 | December
2005 | November
2005 | October
2005 | September
2005 | August
2005 | July
2005 | June
2005 | May
2005 | April
2005 | March
2005 | February
2005 | January
2004 | December
2004 | November
2004 | October
2004 | September
2004 | August
2004 | July
2004 | June
2004 | May
2004 | April
2004 | March
2004 | February
2004 | January
2003 | December
2003 | November
2003 | October
2003 | September
2003 | August
2003 | July
2003 | June
2003 | May
2003 | April
2003 | March
2003 | February
2003 | January
2002 | December



Tracker

About a decade ago, or maybe more, I remember coming across a building which whose interior lighting was primarily provided by an array of flower-like sun collectors on the roof feeding a fiber optic network inside the office tower, bringing not just light but actual sunlight to even the interior offices and rooms. Would someone entering a room with this kind of lighting have a sense that this was sunlight, not just electric, manmade light? Or would the feeling be so close few would notice? In any case, this more recent article (from /.) makes a different (pro) argument for the same technique -- Instead of producing more energy for lighting systems using solar panels, just use that sunlight directly.



1 Comments
Leave Comment...

louis [ 07/28/2005 16:20]: check out that poor grammatical form in the first line - ". . . which whose . . ." choose one or the other, definitely not both. i'd go with "whose", although that sort of makes the building seem like a person, now doesn't it? how about changing the sentence around, "the interior lighting of which was . . ." in other news, the button with the apple on it, when pressed simultaneously with the "Q" key quits applications in a flash. who knew?

 
Design © 2004 Macktez Corporation, Content © 2004 by respective authors