Noah Archives Macktez.com

china and patents



07/13/2004 - 11:06


My other places

Firm - My fellow peeps
Silversmithing - Portfolio & store
Wishlist - At Amazon
Atom - Not-quite-compliant
Friendster - Why oh why?
Myspace - Uh, yeah.
Flickr - Lots of photos

Others' places

Fa - His projects
Ma - Her artwork
Noah - Not me, the other one
Fringe - Dee Dee's Mag
Ev - Prolific mofo
WorkBee - Pinhole cameras
Saturation- Mister Brown
Friends of Buck's Bock - A non-profit
Dojo - Training






Archives

2006 | November
2006 | October
2006 | September
2006 | August
2006 | July
2006 | June
2006 | May
2006 | April
2006 | March
2006 | February
2006 | January
2005 | December
2005 | November
2005 | October
2005 | September
2005 | August
2005 | July
2005 | June
2005 | May
2005 | April
2005 | March
2005 | February
2005 | January
2004 | December
2004 | November
2004 | October
2004 | September
2004 | August
2004 | July
2004 | June
2004 | May
2004 | April
2004 | March
2004 | February
2004 | January
2003 | December
2003 | November
2003 | October
2003 | September
2003 | August
2003 | July
2003 | June
2003 | May
2003 | April
2003 | March
2003 | February
2003 | January
2002 | December



Tracker

a new development on the patent front. china just revoked the viagra patent. onmce details come out, i'll be curious to hear the reasoning.



1 Comments
Leave Comment...

George P.Landow [ 07/16/2004 07:17]: Here's a paragraph from the last chapter of my Hypertext 3.0 (which is almost done.really): Any American objection to China's actions "appears particularly bizarre when viewed from the vantage point of American history, since, as Vincent Mosco points out [in The Digitmal Sublime], the United States, “was the supreme intellectual property pirate of the nineteenth century” (47). It neither respected foreign copyright, such as that on Dickens’s novels, nor gave copyright protection to foreigners unless they published first in the U. S. In fact, “it was not until 1891, when the U. S. had a thriving publishing industry and literary culture of its own, that it extended copyright protection to foreign work.” Mosco then asks the difficult question: “If, as most analysts admit, this was a key to successful national economic development then, why is it wrong for Mexico, India, Brazil, or China to follow this model now? What makes copying CDs in China theft, when copying Great Expectations in nineteenth-century America was deemed simply good business practice?” (47).

 
Design © 2004 Macktez Corporation, Content © 2004 by respective authors